Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Friday called for a response from a Virginia school"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]SB members better get ready to get spanked publicly once more.[/quote] They'd wear a 6-3 rolling from the Court as a badge of pride. [/quote] Ironic that in this day and age, some people are proud to be racists. [/quote] Ironic that people fighting to keep black kids out of TJ are also the ones screaming racism. [/quote] Nobody is keeping blacks out of TJ. Asians are excluded from the policy making (SB) and Asians are excluded from the implementation of the policy (Admissions office/Admissions Panels). They are dominated by whites with some blacks/Hispanics here and there. [/quote] Coalition for TJ is suing to return to a system that [b]excluded back kids. [/b][/quote] Go ahead and show either that the old policy was explicitly racist, or that it was implemented with racist intent. The person making the claim has the burden of proof. [/quote] Well, are we comparing the two policies, or aren't we? Or are we looking at the new policy in a vacuum? In that light, it looks fine. The only reason C4TJ is complaining is because the numbers of students changed from one policy to the next, not because of anything specific about the new policy. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics