Reply to My high stat kid’s experience with admissions

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "My high stat kid’s experience with admissions "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I actually find it hard to believe that the people making the admissions decisions do not differentiate between single sitting, when it was taken, etc., when making admissions decisions UNLESS, the SAT/ACT is not a big differentiator at all but merely a threshold to get beyond to compare the rest of the application.  It is, in fact, more impressive to get a high score with one sitting.

If that is true, however, it is not that surprising that students with great but not amazing scores get in over kids with near perfect scores that don't have a unique voice in their essays and recommendations.  If it took some 4 tries and superscoring to get a 1560, why is that more impressive than a single sitting 1490?[/quote]

With superscores allowed, it really doesn't matter. One sitting or not.[/quote]

But what does that mean, "doesn't matter"?  These decisions are being made by humans, who have data in front of them.  Is it that the only thing being reviewed is the superstore and the reviewers are not told it is a superscore or how many tests it took to get that score?  Do they keep the decision makers in the dark so they are unaware that superscoring exists?  My question is, how can they "unknow" this information and not account for it when making decisions about kids that are hard to distinguish between.  PSAT scores are all one sitting, so I would think NMSF and possibly commended students would get a bit of an edge but I know some with those distinctions that are rejected so I realize it is not necessary decisional either.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics