Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "McConnell is refusing to pay back debt that GOP raked during Trump presidency "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Serious question- why do we even have a debt ceiling? It's been raised multiple times now. Clearly nobody takes it seriously as far as spending is concerned, so maybe they should just get rid of it altogether? [/quote] There’s no debt ceiling in the Constitution, it’s statutory. Congress established the debt ceiling after WWI to encourage fiscal discipline. It didn’t work. [/quote] It wasn't done for fiscal discipline reasons. It was done to make it easier to pay. [/quote] How does establishing a debt ceiling make it easier to pay? It makes it harder to pay. [/quote] Back in the day there needed to be a vote to authorize each tranche of treasuries. The debt ceiling allowed Treasury to sell them on their own. [/quote] Wrong. The debt ceiling was meant to enforce fiscal discipline. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/debt-ceiling.asp[/quote] Investopedia is good for a lot of things. Century old historical intent is not one. It's wrong. https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/181258 [/quote] History News Network is not good for many things at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_debt_ceiling[/quote] "Prior to 1917, the United States had no debt ceiling. Congress either authorized specific loans or allowed Treasury to issue certain debt instruments and individual debt issues for specific purposes."[/quote] “Before the debt ceiling was created, Congress had free reign over the country’s finances. In 1917, the debt ceiling was created during World War I to hold the federal government fiscally responsible.”[/quote] That's your investopwsia statement. It's also an unsupported conjecture. My quote was from YOUR wikipedia entry and is a simple statement of fact. Prior to the debt ceiling Congress authorized each specific tranche of debt. After the debt ceiling Treasury was allowed to issue debt as needed up to a certain dollar amount. If you look further, the initial debt issued under the new authority was only 1/3 of the authorized amount. The logic is inescapble. The debt ceiling was originally created to make the issuanxe of debt less cumbersome and easier. This makes complete sense since it was done in 1917, during a World War!, a time at which it would be insanely stupid to artificially limit spending.[/quote] You’re cherry picking. This is what Wikipedia says: “Prior to 1917, the United States had no debt ceiling. Congress either authorized specific loans or allowed Treasury to issue certain debt instruments and individual debt instruments for specific purposes. Sometimes Congress gave Treasury discretion over which type of debt would be issued. The United States first instituted a statutory debt limit with the Secondary Liberty Bond Act of 1917. This legislation set limits on the aggregate amount of debt that could be accumulated through individual categories of debt (such as bonds and bills). In 1939, Congress instituted the first limit on total accumulated debt over all kinds of instruments.” [/quote] That's exactly what I said. It was a means of giving Treasury discretion and not having to vote every single time. [/quote] You’re completely missing the point. The debt ceiling was meant to reign in Congress, not Treasury. [/quote] Lordy. I understand that you want history to suppport your current partisan position but it just doesn't do that. It is nothing but a procedural quirk. Writing the check to pay the credit card charges we have already incurred.[/quote] Partisan? What does partisanship have to do with it? I’m merely pointing out the truth. There’s nothing partisan about it. We all know that raising the debt ceiling is to pay for debts Congress has already incurred. The debt ceiling was meant to stop Congress from incurring more debt. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics