Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "Why is DCUM SO conservative with housing?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]People comparing their expenses to their parents is always interesting to me. So if the mid-40’s pp whose parents bought a $145,000 house bought it around when he/she was born, that would be about 1975. (FWIW, $145,000 was an expensive house in 1975!) Accounting for inflation, that would be about $740,000 today. Also note that the average 30-year interest rate in 1975 was 9.05%. That interest rate, as compared to today, effectively doubles the payment. They were paying about $1,100 a month if they put $20,000 down. Adjusted for inflation, that would be about $5,600 today. At a 3% interest rate, that would buy about a $1.4 million house (with 20% down). So, somewhat cheaper than today, but not the OMG, a house for $145k(!) cheap. People also forget how expensive things were in the 70’s. Gasoline prices were about the same as today, adjusted for inflation. Clothing prices were much higher. An “inexpensive” t-shirt at the Mall was around $10, which would be about $50 in today’s dollars. We just didn’t have the kind of inexpensive consumer goods that we have today. Note that if the $145,000 had been invested in the stock market in investments that tracked the DJIA, the stocks would be worth over $5 million today. [/quote] I am that PP. they bought it in 1989. [/quote] In 1989, interest rates were as high as 11%. [/quote] Yes, but those 14 years throw off all the other calculations. Importantly, as PP points at, at about 3.6% inflation, a $145K would be work $740K. But it is not - it is worth $2M. Even more importantly, and taking into account the actual year of purchase (1989), using 3.6% inflation, the home would only be worth $450K today. Again, it is worth $2M. At 11%, $116K mortgage in 1989 is $1105, or $3426 today adjusted for inflation (using the 3.6% PP used). That gets you a mortgage of about $812K at 3%, or a $1,015,000 home with 20% down. Again, there home is worth twice that now. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics