Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "S/O Surprisingly good Hollywood casting decisions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I guess if we’re going with surprising, then Tom Hanks in Philadelphia. This was the movie that turned him from the comedic leading man into the serious one. [/quote] I thought Hanks was terrible. He was incapable of seeming actually in love with Antonio Banderas. A friend of mine is married to a movie producer, and told me at the time that Philadelphia was “an important movie for Hollywood to make.” I told her it was almost a decade too late to claim that mantle. [b]Hanks got the Oscar because Hollywood thought it was brave to pretend to be gay on film[/b].[/quote] Yup. Just look who else he was nominated with: Anthony Hopkins, The Remains of the Day Daniel Day-Lewis, In the Name of the Father Laurence Fishburne, What's Love Got to Do with It Liam Nelson, Schindler's List It's quite a stretch to claim that Hanks' acting was superior to those four performances. [/quote] Yet he won none the less, and this thread is about surprisingly good casting decisions, not about who was the best actor in a given movie/role. [/quote] I guess that depends on if you think the point of casting decisions is to hire someone who succeeds in bringing their character to life or to hire someone who wins trophies.[/quote] The point is to bring in a bigger ROI. Hanks is far superior if that is the measuring stick then all of the other named actors. I love me some DD Lewis but his movies pale in comparison from a box office take perspective. I also like the “1,000 of other actors are better than Hanks” comment above. That poster lost all credibility with that statement. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics