Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Sad about minuscule pool of eligible men after divorce at 44"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My intent is to get a full time salaried job that uses my top secret clearance so I don’t lose it and provides health insurance, until I have access to Medicare and AARP supplemental at 65. I’m 56. So inheriting that money would increase my income by 110,000 in dividends unless I set it up not to have access to it as income. Wouldn’t that materially change my income for alimony? While I am comfortable not telling him right now since I found out as a result of him blindsiding me with a PSA, and that money was not part of our 21 years of marital property, I don’t feel comfortable hiding it from him if it materially changes my income after the PSA is final. And at that point I will be 60+ and wanting to use the dividend at least a little so I can enjoy the time I have left. The only reason I wouldn’t disclose the money is if I decide not to work anymore, volunteer or have big hobbies instead or something, and use the dividends as replacement income, and the amount per year is not much different than my salary. Which would mean the alimony wouldn’t change much. Running the numbers, alimony turns off based on his income if I earn more than 80-90K in salary anyway. [/quote] The place where my dad lives has a big military base where I could continue to work with my clearance if I maintain it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics