Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Residents appeal MCPS boundary changes, challenge legality of diversity focus"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I part of the keep boundaries the same group and I agree with some of the negative comments about this lawsuit. It's kind of silly to argue that Neelsville is unsafe. I agree that's probably a true statement but since other kids attend that can't be a winning lawsuit. The winning arguments IMHO: * Middle Schools were not overcrowded. [b]* BOE only moved middle school kids to balance FARMS.[/b] * For kids in CB (if that's where the folks live that filed)- the commutes were made longer when other options were available. [/quote] Nope, the move also helps with articulation. Previously, Daly/Fox Chapel kids went to Neelsville MS and then Clarksburg HS. Now, they will go to Rocky Hill MS and then Clarksburg HS. Similarly, without middle-school reassignment, Cabin Branch and Gibbs ES would have gone to Rocky Hill MS and then Seneca Valley HS; but instead they will go to Neelsville MS and then Seneca Valley HS. As for a longer trip to/from school as a winning argument? Nah. As we learned in the boundary analysis, lots and lots of MCPS students are not zoned for the closest schools.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics