Reply to Meghan and Harry file major lawsuit against British press

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Meghan and Harry file major lawsuit against British press"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This won’t bode well for them. There is nothing they can do to turn the tide of dislike against them. She will always remain ME-Gan, who happens to look a lot like Wallace Simpson, another divorcee that married into the royal family. And she happens to be living in the same house she did too. Go figure.[/quote]

You just compared her to an actual Nazi. But sure you're totally a reasonable person.[/quote]

PP compared Meghan to Wallis Simpson, "another divorcee that married into the royal family".  You're the one who jumped to "actual Nazi".  [/quote]

Wallis was villified for her Nazi connections and the British government moved to exile her husband to the Bahamas because they received damning proof that he was collaborating with the Third Reich and had agreed with Hitler to rule England if the Nazis took it in a campaign.

So yeah, comparing Meghan to Wallis is pretty uncalled for.

Not to mention the fact that the Prince of Wales is *shocker* a divorcee. So his is wife. He's also a stepfather though no one seems to acknowledge that.[/quote]

Typical DCUM reasoning--jump to the most far-fetched and insulting conclusion though no such words were written.[/quote]

PP said Megan looked like Wallis. She doesn't, at all, see below.

[img]https://peopledotcom.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/meghan-markle3.jpg[/img]

So if Megan looks nothing like Wallis and it is easily (EASILY) disproven then what were they aiming for in linking the two women? Wallis was notorious for sullying the British family's name by associating herself and the former King with the third reich. That is what she is known for. So other than being a divorcee, why bring her into this conversation if not to bring nazi allusions into Megan's sphere.

You people are so racist and so revolting. I don't know why I come back to these threads. But it is just so wrong, how you talk about her. It feels like letting you spew your vile uncontested would be participating in this vile racism myself.
[/quote]

Oh my, you're being willfully obtuse. Did you forget the part where Wallis was blamed for a King abdicating the throne? Per Wikipedia, she "was an American socialite whose intended marriage to the British king Edward VIII caused a constitutional crisis that led to Edward's abdication....due to the King's desire to marry a woman who had two living ex-husbands. Constitutionally, the King was required to be in communion with the Church of England, but his proposed marriage conflicted with the Church's teachings." So her sordid past full of divorces (check!) with living ex-husbands (check!) sullied her reputation and, by extension, her husband's (check!). Her introduction in to the family caused chaos and tore the family structure that was in place apart (check!). But let's not let a little thing like history get in the way of your narrative on fabricated racism and MM's victimhood.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics