Reply to 4th Grade CES Admission Criteria?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "4th Grade CES Admission Criteria?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]No one said that.
What they said was it resulted in whites and Asians from WJ competing with whites and Asians from Whitman and BCC for CES spots - leaving Barnsley for more diverse populations.[/quote]

Did the Barnsley CES program stay the same size, so that it's now just drawing from a smaller (and "more diverse") set of ES's - i.e., more spots for the ES schools that remained?  And why would the person making that assertion even care about it unless they felt that it was now harder for students at WJ-cluster ES's to get into a CES program?  If the same 28 kids from the WJ cluster who would have been Barnsley are now at CCES, what's the difference?

Of course they are arguing it's harder because they now now have to compete with "whites and Asians" rather than "more diverse populations."  [/quote]

Yes, Barnsley stayed the same size, three CES classes per grade.[/quote]

So Barnsley, with three classes/grade, went from RM, Rockville, WJ and Wheaton (17-18) to RM, Rockville and Wheaton (18-19)?  And CCES went from two classes for BCC and Whitman (17-18) to three classes for BCC, Whitman and WJ (18-19)?  So the WJ kids went from competing for three classroom's worth of spots with three other high schools, to three classroom's worth of spots with two other high schools.  Sounds great for the Wj kids, unless one thinks that competing with Whitman and BCC kids is harder than competing with RM,Rockville and Wheaton kids.  Which is exactly what the poster was arguing (and not some ridiculous offense of having a diverse program at Barnsley become even more diverse).  I'm of the view that, at the very top. there are equally very strong kids at every ES, and with the small number of kids who are offered spots, it really doesn't matter.  [b]So maybe MCPS actually created more spots by keeping Barnsley at three CES classes for the remaining clusters.  That's fine by me, and would be consistent with its stated policies.[/b][/quote]

Yup, that's exactly what they did.[/quote]

This hardly amounts to a countywide conspiracy to skew CES admissions to the under represented. [/quote]
It's a way for non W cluster students a chance at the spot because without the change and with the peer cohort criteria, they wouldn't be able to get in. If they had done universal screening without looking at the peer cohort, the representation of certain groups wouldn't have changed that much.  How do I know this... look at MCPS' own statistics in regards to test scores. Oh, I know, test scores don't tell you much, but I'm not sure what else you would look at for an academic program. Maybe how fast you could run?  My DC would've failed that one.

Call it whatever you want.  [/quote]

This is rank speculation.  [b]They aren't selecting students, then or now, based on some median test score or percentage of students at grade level.[/b]  It's based on individual qualifications.  So unless you are willing to say that NO "non W cluster students" would qualify based on his or her own test scores (which, actually, is exactly what you said), this is just a gross generalization.  Assuming three classes per grade at each regional CES, they are looking for the less than 95 students across the covered clusters. Unless you have the data for the students actually there, and students who aren't there, you can't make that assertion credibly.

[/quote]
Of course they used to base it on test scores, along with other criteria.  Otherwise, why bother having them take a test?  That makes no sense.

Prior to this change, when they used to show the median test scores of admitted students, people would post on this forum what the median scores were.  Cold Spring HGC was always the highest.  I can't remember where Barnsely fell in the hierarchy, but I believe it was third highest or something like that.  But with pulling WJ out, I am pretty sure the median test scores of the accepted students at Barnsely CES went down. Again... why would I suspect this.. look at MCPS' own numbers.

Easy enough to figure out if MCPS released the median scores of accepted students like they used to do.  But they don't do that anymore along with "peer cohort". Things that make you go "hmmm..."

You have reading comprehension issues. I stated that there were other kids from other clusters represented (mine was one) but that WJ contingent was *huge*.  If they didn't look at peer cohort but still did universal screening, the numbers wouldn't move that much.  Again, how do I know this... just look at MCPS' own statistics on test scores from the other clusters.

You are being purposefully obtuse because you can't admit that this change was a way to up the representation of URM without using race.  What was the point of the Metis report?   I'm not arguing whether this change was good or bad.  I'm just stating what's pretty obvious to most people. The change came about because of the Metis report which clearly indicated that there was very low representation of URM in the magnets.  The Metis report also indicated that a barrier to entry may be lack of knowledge of the program, which is why MCPS decided on universal screening.  No one, myself included, thinks universal screening is bad.  But clearly, MCPS had to add the "peer cohort" criteria in order to include in more URM because otherwise, why include "peer cohort"? If indeed these students can get in without changing the admissions criteria, then why include "peer cohort"?  MCPS could've just done universal screening, exclude parental input, and let the chips fall where they may. But no, they had to add "peer cohort" because otherwise, the needle wouldn't move. MCPS'  own statistics show that this would be the case.[/quote]

+1
The people who keep arguing this was not about increasing diversity are very confused. You can argue whether this was legal or good or whatever but the facts are facts.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics