Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "RM Cluster Overcrowding?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]400 kids in IB. RM iwill be over crowded by similar number. Shift IB to some other HS. IB doesn't need to be in RM. Else shift Twinbrook ES to Woodward. [/quote] IB isn't a separate program from the school. You can't just shift it out. All students are in the MYP in 9th and 10th grades, and students not in the magnet cohort join the IB Diploma in 11th and 12th grades. In addition to the 100 kids per grade from out of area, there are about 60-80 per grade of home school students completing the IB diploma. Sure, you could move the magnet students elsewhere - maybe to another existing IB school, but they all have overcrowding too. Perhaps Magruder? It's underenrolled. But creating an IB program from scratch is no easy task, and it isn't like Magrduer is central to the county like RM is. Moving the magnet is a non-starter.[/quote] Then only other viable option is to shift Twinbrook to Woodward.[/quote] Why would MCPS shift Twinbrook to Woodward HS (intended to address capacity in the Walter Johnson and DCC clusters), when plans for Crown HS (intended to address capacity in the Rirchard Montgomery, Quince Orchard, Gaithersburg, and Wootton clusters) are under way?[/quote] Woodward will be there in 5 years. Crown will be there in 10 years. So if we can't use Woodward to help RM then RM is not going to get any help for the next 10 years. In meanwhile let's build more condos to make TC dense and let's make RM more over crowded. That's the direction city council is going here. [/quote] Well, go to the city council meeting on the 17th, tell them you live in Bethesda and don’t want Rockville town center to be successful.[/quote] Why will I tell them that I live in Bethesda? I have kids in Elementary school in RM cluster and very worried about hearing science in cart situation in RM. MD report card puts RM at 56 percentile. That horrible. I can't afford to sell and move so I don't want RM to drop down even more. [/quote] It was a half joke. I can’t tell where people live but it seems clear that some people posting here are not in the city. [b]My question to you is, do you think having a “failed mall” environment at the town square will be helpful for the schools? [/b] I believe it will lower property values and drive some of the higher income families away. That will almost certainlyy lower test scores. A couple thousand residents will add maybe 50 students to the high school over 10-15 years and likely save the town center. It will push property values up and make the whole place more desirable. The local ES (Beall) has the capacity for ES students thanks to the new school.[/quote] Failed mall is not going to impact kids education, but having science in cart is robbing them a chance to get a decent education. Right now we have cart in science crap in RM due to over crowding. RM is at 56 percentile so pretty much an average school and nothing to be proud here. It will be highly unfair to kids if we push for more development in already over crowded school. First there should be a solution with a fixed time line. If solution brings capacity from 120% utilization to 80-90% then we should go for development. Putting 20 condos in town center will be net negative for overcrowded schools than positive. It will be net positive only if overcrowding situation is addressed.[/quote] It’s interesting that you don’t believe lowered property values will correlate to lower test scores.[/quote] Low test score due to low property value is simply an outcome of less well off parents not having enough time to focus on kids. MCPS teaches the same thing and provides the same opportunities to all students. But if we are talking about 120-130% overcrowding then we are simply providing the same kids less opportunity. You are focused on property value. I am focused on quality of education. Science on cart is about quality of education. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics