Reply to Girl Scouts sues Boys Scouts for including girls

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Girl Scouts sues Boys Scouts for including girls"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There are a lot of interesting but insufficiently informed posts on this string, mainly due to posters being unfamiliar with the Boy Scouts of America and its program and operational techniques.  I am thoroughly familiar with both of them, so I will share a few items rather directly that some on this string will probably not agree with, but facts are facts.  I will speak to the Junior-Senior high school programming currently called Boy Scouts that will become Scouts BSA in February.  I remind everyone that the new program will not be co-ed.  Boys will be only with boys and lead boys, and girls will be only with girls and lead girls

Girl Scouts has a horrible organizational model that limits access to its troops, which compared to Boy Scout Troops are small and temporarily-existing entities overseen by volunteer bureaucrats who add little value to the experience of the girls.  Boy Scout Troops, when successful, are large entities that are fueled with about 15 adult leaders.  A lot of these leaders are women – been that way for 15 years.  The Boy Scout Troops range from 30 on the small side to many in the area that are from 80-100.  They are subdivided into Patrols, and the entire thing is run by the boys with close advising by the Scoutmaster Staff of the unit.  The BSA is taking the identical organizational approach with the Scouts BSA troops for Girls that will form in the spring.  Scouts BSA Troops last indefinitely and include all ranges of ages from 11 to 18.  They are large, sophisticated entities and girls are definitely up to running something big and sophisticated.  Scouts BSA Troops (which will be the inclusive program name for both the all-girl and all-boy Troops) run by management techniques that minimize and eliminate wasted time, meetings and bureaucracy.

Advancement in Scouts BSA is rigorous and cumulative over many years.  When a Scouts BSA member earns Eagle Scout, anyone in the community knows what they have learned – a comprehensive curriculum of outdoor, rescue, physical fitness, psychological toughness, citizenship and decision-making skills.  When someone is an Eagle Scout, he – and soon she – is respected because they have passed a difficult and known series of tests.  No exceptions are made.  When someone is a Gold Girl Scout, that person is respected but there is no particular understanding of what was done to obtain the award.  Eagles have lifelong preferences and career advancement through a strong and professionally-maintained network.  Girls deserve to be part of that.

The outdoor and sophisticated technical curricula of Scouts BSA is advanced and implemented thoroughly by thousands of volunteers across the metropolitan area.  It has been that way for decades.  It remains to be seen whether the various and evolving program trends that are adopted and dropped by GSUSA will ever make a sustained impact on society the way Scouts BSA training does.  Printing guide books and announcing a set of colorful badges to mimic the BSA curriculum does not, in itself, accomplish much.

The lawsuit by the GSUSA is a laugh.  There is no “confusion” about what organization these families are joining.  They are knowingly and purposefully joining the organization that families have justifiably relied on to significantly advance the prospects of generations of boys – and now girls.  They know exactly what they are joining and why.  It is nothing other than money-grubbing attempt by the GSUSA bureaucracy.  If this is the best response the GSUSA has to offer (instead of cleaning up their own dysfunctional financial and management process), the movement will become a small specialty organization.

Finally, the cookie sales program and sale of historic GSUSA camps is the manner by which the GSUSA is addressing the systematic underfunding of the pensions of their employees.  As a result, the percentage of profit kept by these GSUSA troops is a pittance compared to the normal profits of other youth organizations.  Parents of girls despise the forced months of cookie sales and are leaving to get away from it.

Parents wanting a robust experience for their girls and volunteers wanting to rationally use their time and resources are avoid or leaving the GSUSA for good reasons.
[/quote]

Source, please?  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics