Reply to Which positions are most in demand

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Which positions are most in demand"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]ManCity does not define all of soccer. They won last year; this year, it will be someone else. What about when Leicester City won, or Chelsea, or whomever?

You can't get hung up on one team's performance one single year and re-interpret all of soccer around that one time. [/quote]

Agreed you cannot just use one team. Enter team 2. The USWNT - http://www.espn.com/espnw/sports/article/23042864/crystal-dunn-versatility-key-uswnt-moving-forward-win-mexico

Sorry buddy. I am just picking the best teams in the world as examples for how MFs are having success in the back.

Do you have a better explanation for how these teams brought MFs to the back and had such success? Money and luck? C'mon.

You can attack me all you want, I have thick skin so no worries. But explain the Inverted Full Back success...[/quote]

Let me try to understand your logic.  Fullbacks are having success as inverted fullbacks at ManCity.  Some midfielders are able to play fullback position when they are deployed as inverted fullbacks.   Therefore, the fullback position is easy to fill and unimportant.  Your logic is flawed.   ManCity spend over 100 million pounds on this position last year, so they clearly value position more than you do.   Here's anther take on the importance of fullback position from a respected soccer journalist, it's a bit dated, but may of the basic concepts remain true.  https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2009/mar/25/the-question-full-backs-football
 [/quote]

+1000[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics