Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Alexandria Mayor Race"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] IF the Council and Mayor KNEW that the NDA was not binding (which I do not believe - based on the WAPO article I think that what WMATA told Jinks is different from what was in the email to the project engineer, and that all the elected based their behavior on what they heard from Jinks) then it suggests that both Silberberg and Wilson are equally culpable, ergo this has no bearing on the race for Mayor. At least the primary, as I presume if the GOP nominates anyone for November, that person will not be an incumbent member of the Council. [/quote] Both Silberberg and Wilson obviously assumed blindly, with no checking, that what Jinks told them was true: NDA was in force and binding. They always assume that what Jinks tells them is true. And sometimes it is. But they both should have known better. And the one thing they should be able to agree on is, no more Jinks. [/quote] IF what Jinks told the WaPo is true, than Jinks was not lying, and checking with the individuals who spoke to Jinks would have given Wilson and Silberberg (and Smedberg, BTW) the same thing - that the NDA applied. Not clear to me that even with a lot of sniffing around WMATA, they would have hit the person who wrote the email saying it did not apply. Certainly it would be good to know who at WMATA Jinks was in communication with, and in what format. Certainly that should be investigated before any personnel action is taken against Jinks or any of his subordinates, IMO. [/quote] Before Jinks agreed that the NDA was binding, he should have read the damned thing and given it to the city attorney for an immediate and thorough scrub. Plainly, he did neither. As a result, he prejudiced the City's entire position on the project. Fire him. Now. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics