Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Question for Women - Dating advice for 51 year old man."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]And yes, he will be evaluated on his lack of savings, so he will need to up his "game" in other areas. Why do you think women should find men attractive that bring nothing to the relationship? Why? [/quote] And what do you bring other than an appreciation for his money?[/quote] If a 50yo man wants to date and have a meaningful relationship with a 25-30yo woman, he probably has to bring something else to the table, something that is much more attractive than what an average 25-30yo man has. Oftentimes this is $$. Is this so hard to understand?[/quote] This is stupid and wrong. [b]20-somethings don't want money. They want to have fun and be entertained. This does not cost money.[/b] The women who want your money are age 30-50. They are far more ruthless, greedy, and conniving than any 20-something.[/quote] Why do you think a 25-30yo woman is going to want to have fun with a 50yo man rather than a 25-30yo man, given that it is the same entertainment (no difference in cost)?[/quote] I’m still trying to figure out what entertainment costs no money. Are you meeting up at Smithsonians that are within walking distance and not purchasing any food? Because anything else has a transportation, food, and or entrance cost unless you are hanging at someone’s house with no food provided. Once I was post college if a guy tried to suggest a stay home and chill for date 2 or 3, I would say we weren’t compatible.[/quote] There appears to be this idea that if you're 50, you have to do stupidly expensive things to entertain younger women - fly them to Paris or whatever. This is wrong. It costs no more to entertain 20-somethings when you're 50 than it did when you were a 20-something yourself. Of course, gold-digging parasite women exist in every age group, and if she's like that you're better off finding out quickly so you can next her and not waste any more time.[/quote] It's not that, it's the recognition that your age is a drawback for a 20-something crowd, and you have to compensate for this in other ways. It's like this. Antoine Arnault, the handsome, never-married, intelligent son of the richest man in Europe, has partnered up with a divorcee who has three kids from her first marriage. Is this a natural match? No, because men like him can easily find someone never married with no kids. Why has this match happened? Because his partner compensates for her history by being a world-known beauty and top ten supermodel with an active social and philanthropic life. This is how the balance is equalized. Likewise, a 20-year old, all things considered, would rather be with another 20-year old. Can she be with a 50-year old? Sure. But he'd have to bring other things to the table to equalize the balance and compensate for not being 20. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics