Reply to United forces woman to put puppy in overhead bid, where it dies during flight

Forum Index » Pets

Reply to "United forces woman to put puppy in overhead bid, where it dies during flight"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Sorry, I don't understand how you can get a dog and not know what you're getting into. Your breed, its limitations, issues faced when traveling, and going above and beyond to make sure you go in fully informed. It's your animal, and you can't expect the world to accommodate you or know your animal and its tolerances.

That seems to be a problem with a lot of pet ownership these days - people want a dog as a status symbol, for companionship, because they think they're "fun" or cute or whatever. They jump into it with such negligent ignorance on the responsibility. You can't expect others to care/know more about your dog than you do.

[/quote]

Huh?  If the FA had placed the baby up in that carry on compartment instead and the baby suffocated, instead, I guess that would "prove" that the mother should have known her child's limitations and never brought her baby on the plane?

Obviously, the mother would never have allowed her child to be placed up there.  But if the FA indicated that placing the pet carrier up there was a safe thing to do, I can see how an owner might reluctantly agree to that rather than disembark.  I'm sure the owner had no idea that the compartment lacked air.[/quote]

This makes no sense. A dog is not a human. I get that you think your dog is human because you profess to love that dog like it was a human. But, a dog is not a human. This is going too far.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics