Reply to Roy Moore the Pedophile

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roy Moore the Pedophile"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Other than it looks bad to you, I'm sorry to say, not too many people will find it objectionable.

So he likes girls on the young side. They were all 16 to 18, certainly an age where girls date and have sexual relationships without raising eyebrows.  If they were 12 or 13, that's another story.  But 16+...meh.   None of them reported forced contact or sexual relationship.  So...what's the big deal? He couldn't have known he'd become a public figure.  I get that you think a 30-year old should not be dating 16-year olds, and that's certainly a prudent point of view.  But as far as I'm concerned, nothing criminal took place.  [/quote]

The central figure in the story was 14. I guess that's in a grey area for you? 16 is fine but 12-13 is problematic... so where do 14-15 fall on your spectrum?

A 32 year old coming on to someone he KNEW was 16 is pretty gross too.[/quote]

And he came onto the 14 year at the courthouse when her mother was there in the court having a child custody hearing.  That's predatory in the way that priests abuse vulnerable children.[/quote]

I responded only to the posted abstract. I can't access the whole article.  If one of them was 14, that changes things. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics