Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Pete Hedgseth for Secretary of Defense"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Gillibrand claimed there were no "quotas." Did she see this memo? https://www.af.mil/Portals/1/documents/2022SAF/Officer_Source_of_Commission_Applicant_Pool_Goals_memo.pdf[/quote] Those are GOALS for the "applicant pool" - not final quotas. Please learn how to read and think.[/quote] If you do not understand that OERs (Officer Efficiency Reports) likely mention whether or not an officer meets "goals," you have never been an officer in the military. If this "goal" is important to your superior, believe me, it will be taken into consideration. Of course they didn't say "quotas" because they know that is illegal. This is just another way to get around it. [/quote] :lol: :lol: :lol: If you think OER stands for Officer Efficiency Reports, you have never been an officer in the military.[/quote][/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
