Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Wheaton numbers are wrong unless there is an explanation regarding the Edison overlap.[/quote] And why would the CIP mention nothing about this apparent Edison space? The numbers from Flo Analytics are not valid.[/quote] Idk maybe the studies have different goals. Maybe the space is shared and doesn’t require building parameters, which is the focus of the CIP but not the utilization.[/quote] The explanations they have provided are inconsistent and nonsensical so I am guessing there is no explanation. It's just easier to pretend Wheaton has 500 more seats than it does because it makes their numbers look better and give the west county kids more space and more appealing FARMS rates.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
