Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]https://mobile.twitter.com/jbendery/status/1190326236192616449 Seems that those who said Brett isn’t fit for the bench are right.[/quote] Because he met with people who don’t think that 8 percent of the US population should control the country? [/quote] Does your post make sense to you? Do you understand that justices are supposed to be beyond any conflict of interest? And here’s Bretty (and Scalia) just rubbing our noses in it that they’re nothing but conflicts of interest. It seems just the GOP justices have this problem as Thomas never mentions his conflicts of interest, nor does he recuse. In any event, this is more evidence that bretty is indeed unsuitable for the task.[/quote] So when Ruth Bader Ginsburg meets with liberals there is no conflict of interest? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics