Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "FFRDCs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My take is that a lot of these FFRDCs are just sucking up budgets w/o bringing extra value. A lot has happened which require change and big 4s and FFRDC are the one that need to cut the fat the most. [/quote] Don't disagree at all. The idea behind FFRDCs isn't bad, [b]the recent implementation has been pretty bad[/b].[/quote] How so?[/quote] Poor choice of words, maybe "things I've seen after a few years" Worked at two FFRDCs over the years. Maybe my view is biased on what I've seen. At the core each was the SME on the topic that's being worked, helping the government solve the hard problem, or help with acquisition, or to evaluate the performer solution in an unbiased way, create regulations for things like AI. This is awesome and much needed. At each, work ebbs and flows and you don't always need all that expertise. So then what happens? Papers are published for the sake of publishing papers. Overhead dollars are spend on building tools the government may need one day. Etc. I get it, you have to run a business... but... feels like a huge waste[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics