Reply to FCPS Boundary Review

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "FCPS Boundary Review - New Maps"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's absolutely laughable that they still think they can implement boundary changes in 26-27 when they clearly don't have maps ready for feedback yet. It has to be finalized (with ALL the details) by early January, so families have time to consider their grandfathering options and kids can pick classes at the appropriate school.

That's about 4-5 months from now and they've done NOTHING since this all started in spring of 2024. [/quote]

I bet they delay it. Seeds were planted yesterday.[/quote]

I don’t think they delay it, I think they massively scale it back. They all seem exhausted from the process and now realize the hornets’ nest that is boundary changes. They want to do other things, but the boundary review continues to suck all the oxygen out of the room. They won’t delay it because they don’t want to deal with it another year and certainly not in an election year.[/quote]

Yup, sorry West Springfield folks. Sandy Anderson is going to have her way. And maybe they'll fix Coates? But I think they will otherwise scale this back. They'll say they do more "phased" changes later and just back away.[/quote]

I don’t like Reid much, but the lack of responsibility for attempting to institute WAAAAY too many changes rests with the board.  I find it annoying that they are passing the buck to Reid, when they established the stupid parameters and are now trying to squeal that it is Reids fault.

No, school board, you INSISTED on redoing the policy AND on making broad changes. You APPROVED THRU.  This is 90% on you all.  It is asinine to throw this on Reid. The only one I give a pass to is Ricardy Anderson and Meren because they seem to think at least a little.  The rest of them need to own up to the fact that they can’t get all of this done.[/quote]

Didn't Cumming say something about going too fast?[/quote]

I think Dunn has been somewhat against this process the entire time.

Man, we need Megan McLaughlin and Elizabeth Schultz back.[/quote]

It’s Dunne, not Dunn, and he was a big supporter of a county-wide review at first.  If he’s changed his mind it’s because of feedback he’s since gotten from people in his district, like those who don’t want to be redistricted as part of a “fix” to locate Whitman MS within its attendance area. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics