Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]DP than anyone who has posted in the last few days. I’m totally confused at the argument posters are making that the NYT gave Baldoni appropriate time to truly respond. [/b] It was a Friday night during the holidays. The story ran the next day. It would be one thing if Blake had said he raped or assaulted me and he vehemently denied that. But her allegations required a lot of nuance and time to respond. The article implied there was no IC. Later we learned there was one, Blake didn’t meet with her, causing Baldoni to relay notes to Blake which later she weaponized against him. That context took some explaining and if he had ONLY responded to that he would have looked nuts. Because she went into say she was shown porn, when later we learned she wasn’t shown anything resembling porn. And on and on. She was uncomfortable in situations and we later found out those were situations she created. She had threatened to walk off the film and refused to sign her contract or update her nudity rider. She had two female ADs fired. Her husband berated and harassed Baldoni. She violated several guilds through her actions. I could go on, but we all know this. It actually took some time for Justin to pull his evidence together and get it out, the texts, the emails, later the video footage hence the website of 250 pages that we got 10 days later or whatever. But you all know this. And now Megan twoey knows this too, which is why she looks stupid, and why nobody has heard from her since this happened.[/quote] PPs very clearly point is that Baldoni's people did respond and did not ask for more time. Had they asked for more time, we might be in a very different position. Repeatedly asserting that Baldoni did not have sufficient time when he NEVER SAID THAT HIMSELF is odd.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics