Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It kind of feels stupid to argue with the remaining two Baldoni supporters at this point. They don’t seem to accept reality when facts do not fall in their favor, but just dig in their heels or change the subject. Wait, in a minute the rude angry one will write a screed referencing plantation Barbie because she’s big mad now.

None of them ever says, huh, you were right about that one thing. None of them have grown any wiser to Freedman.  It’s just deny, deflect, distract all the way down.  If you’re losing on one topic, change the subject. [/quote]

There are more than 2 people who don’t think Blake acted decently. But you’re doing your thing in bogging this chain down with your strategy. Long winded nonsense that twists the facts, making as hominen attacks and overall just trying to change the narrative as much as possible.

I’ve admitted when I see some good moves for BL, although I haven’t seen that many tbh. I thought the amicus on the CA law was not a bad move, although you sort of ruined it by going too hard on the feminist victim issue and the lawyer who filed a brief has shown herself to be little difficult and petty and unprofessional seeming (she posted on LinkedIn and people were asking valid questions which she ran to delete and attack in childish terms). And people are asking pointed questions about her relationship and why she stayed in it for years even though she was married herself, and she only seemed to go forward when she found out she wasn’t the only one.  I don’t think that doesn’t make what the professor did correct or not firing worthy fwiw, but it isnt a great look. But I agree the law seems well intentioned, if not potentially flawed and clearly being misused by Blake.

Other than that, I haven’t seen a lot of smart moves from the BL side, mostly just desperation.

And I continue to believe she should try to settle this- and no, not necessarily for 400M although I’m sure you’ll gloss over that as you always do and start ranting about Baldoni (as an individual) not deserving 400m and not ‘proving’ his damages yet!!’

But yes, she should try to come to a confidential settlement and work on some bland blanket statement with Baldoni et al ‘we’ve settled our differences privately, blah blah’ and move on. If she had good advice, this is what she should do. Instead she seems to be doubling down and further risking the opportunity to come to an exit plan. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics