Reply to ECNL moving to school year part 2

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Whomever is considered "older" in age groups get an advantage, but it's conferred over years to the point where the younger kids drop out by middle school. That's RAE.

In this switch for soccer -- which should be studied by experts who track these trends -- has a large group of players who have received those RAE benefits to put them %-wise at the top of the sport. Now that those players get to play up against slightly older players where the volume of competitors are currently playing at a lower level. Will 6 months really matter?[/quote]

The Q4 kids that have been playing against players that are almost one year older have been able to play at a high level despite these advantages.  It is well documented that Q4s that are still playing competitively at 14, 15, and 16 years old end up outperforming their peers over the medium to long term.

The Q4s that play at a high level find ways to perform well that compensate for their physical disadvantages.  On average, they’re technically and tactically superior because otherwise they couldn’t cut it.  Even physically, they fight harder to not be so far behind.

Then all of a sudden they’re the oldest players on their team.  They’re physically advanced relative to their younger peers.  They’re already technically and tactically more advanced than their younger peers.

So, on average, they’re now physically, technically, and tactically advanced.  Big advantage.[/quote]

All except those players, especially the better ones, might fight like hell to stay on their current teams, seeing that playing with younger players will stunt their development.[/quote]
If this was true there would currently be a far greater number of January to May birthdays playing up.   I guess by that logic all January to May players are currently stunting their development in a BY system.  [/quote]

That's because clubs limit these opportunities on purpose to reign in overly-ambitious parents. THIS tranistion, however, will be different, one-time where parents/kids will go nuclear because they've been on the same team for several years. Their arguments will win out, at least in the short term.[/quote]
Not true at all,  the players would be on a lower team of they played up an age group.  They don't want to sign up for that.  [/quote]

We shall see. Depends on the club. This will be why they'll have to max out the rosters.[/quote]

If you’re an Aug - Dec kid and your options are to stay on a team with a maxed out roster and maybe play some, or play on the “lower” team and play a lot regardless of roster, I wonder what the choice will be. If you have an Aug - Dec kid, unless you’re a true top player (probably not) or you’re already passed recruiting age, you’re going to be playing on the age appropriate team. Of course, if you’re at a small club that doesn’t have a lot of competition, then your chances of staying on the older team increase. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics