Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "If Jesus wasn’t a real historical figure, where did Christian theology come from? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Even Bart Ehrman says: "Paul knew Jesus' brother, James, and he knew his closest disciple, Peter, and he tells us that he did," Ehrman says. "If Jesus didn't exist, you would think his brother would know about it, so I think Paul is [b]probably pretty good evidence [/b]that Jesus at least existed." https://www.npr.org/2012/04/01/149462376/did-jesus-exist-a-historian-makes-his-case Ehrman also says this: But how can you make a convincing case if we’re talking about thirty or so independent sources that know there was a man Jesus? These sources are not all living in the same village someplace so they are egging each other on. They didn’t compare notes. They are independent of one another and are scattered throughout the Mediterranean. They each have [b]heard about [/b]the man Jesus from their own sources of information, [b]which heard about[/b] him from their own sources of information. https://ehrmanblog.org/gospel-evidence-that-jesus-existed/[/quote] "pretty good evidence" is not definitive. Not 100%. So none of the "sources" were eyewitnesses. They only "knew" thirdhand information, at best. [/quote] Again, as we have discussed multiple times, you don't get to decide. The consensus among modern scholars is that Jesus is a real, historical figure. There is no doubt among these scholars that Jesus existed. Just because you don't like the evidence doesn't make it "likely." That's like saying you believe in the flat Earth because you reject the consensus that the Earth is round and all the evidence is faked.[/quote] The consensus is that it's [i]most likely[/i] that he existed. Not 100%. It has nothing to do with "liking" evidence or not. We just don't have reasonable level of independent verification to know 100%. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics