Reply to Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Wall Street Journal exclusive: 
[b]Trump ordered the removal of the ambassador to Ukraine after months of complaints from allies, including Rudy Giuliani, that she was undermining him abroad and obstructing efforts to persuade Kyiv to investigate Biden.[/b]
 https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-ordered-ukraine-ambassador-removed-after-complaints-from-giuliani-others-11570137147?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/2yoTb1G7Ow[/quote]

WSJ, huh? Ouch. That’s gotta hurt. 
[/quote]

The ambassador is part of Trump’s administration. He can remove her if he chooses.

Notice how there has been no vote, as traditional, which would allow Rs to participate in the investigation. That’s very telling. I was wondering why all the speculative threads were at the top of this sub-forum. Now I know why....[/quote]

Sure he can.  He can remove any and all ambassadors, good ones and bad ones.  Should he?  Well, he's the president.  He's supposed to have sense and wisdom and, where he's lacking those, good advisors.

But he removed an experienced career ambassador because Giuliani didn't like her, because she was obstructing his efforts to ... make Ukraine investigate Biden for political campaign purposes.

Volker's testimony and texts/emails + all of the public and published facts of the spring and summer = BAD.  [/quote]

Just because she’s a career diplomat doesn’t mean she should keep her job.

I’m amazed at the outrage over Trump asking Ukraine to get to the bottom of whether or not Biden’s son was in the job as a favor to Biden, given the Steele dossier, and the FISA warrants that resulted from that.  I’m also amazed that you believe that the texts - where it explicitly says that Trump said no quid-pro-quo, is a smoking gun.

If Pelosi and Schiff are so sure of what they have, open the investigation process to a vote and let the Rs participate.

[/quote]

This.

Sounds to me like another crazy witch hunt.[/quote]

Another? There *never has been* a crazy witch hunt. There was a legitimate investigation into Russian meddling in our last presidential election that Trump managed to make about himself.  The findings of that investigation should be disturbing to all Americans.  Now we have another legitimate investigation of obvious wrongdoing.

It is unfortunate that you lack any moral compass and deceive yourself in this way in order to prop up your false hope in this worthless POTUS.[/quote]

A legitimate investigation into Russian interference in our last presidential election would have investigated what the President then did to prevent such interference, which we now know started before 2014, and why we failed, and how to fix it.

What took place was a crazy witch hunt.[/quote]

Gee, why not?

SMH[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics