Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So I don't think Blake was sexually harassed. But one question I keep coming back to is: Did she lie about sexual harassment, knowing that she wasn't? Or does she personally believe she actually was sexually harassed?

It's hard to believe the latter based on the way she and Ryan have treated this whole situation (Blake kissing Justin unscripted, Ryan making jokes about Justin, Blake being so flippant about domestic abuse in interviews).

But she did ostensibly get so bothered about Justin at one point that she and Ryan came up with that list and Ryan berated Justin over it. And it's hard for me to wrap my head around her being a complete sociopathic liar.

Does anyone have a good unified theory explaining all of this?[/quote]

I have a theory. I don’t think this was premeditated. I think Blake and Justin didn’t get along and Blake used her power to be a big a-hole. It all would’ve been fine but SJ showed her those texts and Blake really thought the WF parties were trying to smear here. Blake then went to her lawyers and they likely explained to her that retaliation while it sucks is not actionable unless tied to protected activity. Enter the SH. That’s why the SH never made sense. They were cobbling together any minor example they could think of to try to fit the definition of pervasive to give their retaliation claim legs, which it just doesn’t have without SH. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics