Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^ I’ve now read the text of the law and personally I hope that Liman avoids the constitutional issue altogether either by saying CA doesn’t apply and/or her action was filed with malice.

I think the amicus were well intentioned but I don’t think they know who they’re siding with in terms of the facts. Fine. One can support the law, but still find it shouldn’t be weaponized inappropriately. Which is what Blake is doing here.

I’ll add that I think this was a decent PR move by Blake’s side, so congrats to you. You earned part of your fees [/quote]

Just a normal feminist lawyer who happens to disagree with you about mostly everything in this case, but please keep finding excuses for male feminist Justin Baldoni, whose ace attorney Bryan Freedman is arguing that this CA law should be overturned as unconstitutional. [/quote]

DP I’m a woman and I believe this law should be overturned as unconstitutional. Similar laws have already been overturned in other states. It’s abundantly clear that this law is being weaponized by Blake. Any woman with a husband or son should be against this law. It should not be this easy to ruin an innocent person. I have to think that most of this law’s supporters are childless, unmarried or in lavender relationships like Blake because the rest of us know this could easily be our husbands or sons. [/quote]

Please, say more![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics