Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I love love love that Elyse Dorsey is filing an amicus brief.  She survived Jeffrey Wright’s defamation harassment suit and is speaking out to prevent other victims from undergoing the same abuse if the legal system. Dorsey’s harasser even admitted via texts that he sued for defamation to bankrupt his accusers, also texting “maybe defamation for fun but not to win.”

These defamation suits are just fun little hurtful strategies that vindictive lawyers like Wright and Freedman are using to hurt victims of SH/SA, so that maybe they can settle the cases early and they never see the light of day.

Dorsey also compares Virginia’s relatively weak anti-SLAPP statute which allowed Wright’s defamation claims to proceed and require legal defense for over a year, against California’s stronger law which Dorsey argues Liman should allow to protect Lively here against Baldoni’s defamation claims.

Coming from Dorsey, this means something and I hope Liman listens. [/quote]

Responding to myself to note that Baldoni supporters are already viscerally attacking Elyse Dorsey over on the It Ends With Lawsuits subreddit.

It will be interesting to see how Freedman responds to these briefs, if he chooses to, which I think he will. I don’t to ink he’ll be as aggro as he is against Lively, but I predict a 50% aggression level, [b]still enough to insult actual SA/SH survivors [/b](Wright was fired for cause by his university) in defense of Baldoni.  Freedman gonna Freedman. [/quote]

Again, many of us have been harassed and some of us support Freedman. You are trying to twist the narrative and make Baldoni/Freedman play against SA/SH victims and survivors.  That’s not the case at all and is a false narrative that you continue to perpetuate.

The push is against those who ‘falsely’ claim to be SA/SH victims. Many, many of us still assert that BL was not a SA/SH victim by Baldoni, and we embrace the Baldoni-Freedman narrative.

Stop making this an anti SH/SA show. It’s an anti fake SH/SA show.[/quote]

No.  Actual victims of SA/SH and lawyers representing their interests have now filed two amicus briefs supporting Lively. Those are facts.  What is false about that narrative?  If Freedman responds, he will oppose them.

Baldoni filed a $400 million defamation claim against the woman who accused him of harassment.  This is now a strategy in the handbook of harassers everywhere from Bill Cosby to Johnny Depp and now Justin Baldoni.

Zero such people and organizations have filed amicus briefs on behalf of Baldoni.

You don’t believe Lively, but I do, and these amicus briefs call Baldoni out for his defamation claims which are meant purely to punish and discourage victims for/from coming forward. [/quote]

More contortions. Keep trying!

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics