Reply to Option H is permanent and the old Wootton HS campus will be closed for good?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Option H is permanent and the old Wootton HS campus will be closed for good?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wootton is the affordable W school[/quote]

Which is why it's the easier target and the one always beat up on.

As previous poster mentioned, once can choose to settle for a little bit less for the money in choosing Wootton vs some other areas.

And the same can be said for choosing Wootton over some of the other richer areas.

But this whole process shows what areas are more protected and in hindsight it is apparent, where some of the schools there don't have to deal with some of the nonsense that some of the Wootton cluster schools did.  Those Wayside parents sure didn't want to get zoned to Wootton.

So it may very well be worth it to move to an even older/smaller home in these richer areas but also have more protection against these kinds of things.[/quote]

No one is targeting or beating up on Wootton.  Wootton is just being unrealistic about the boundary situation and crying about it.

First it was unfair that Dufief has to leave the cluster
Second was it is unfair that the school is falling apart
Third is that it is unfair that Wootton needs to move to a new building
Fourth is that it is unfair that Gaithersburg students will be at the new building with Wootton.

Wootton boundaries are right along where the area with Crown.  There will be [b]changes to Wootton[/b].  You all need to be realistic about the situation.  [/quote]
Changes like:
being moved to a new building miles from the original
a new name
new student cohort
[b]new teachers
new admin
new programs[/b]
leveling the old Wootton

Apart from those things it'll be EXACTLY THE SAME.[/quote]

The bolded has no basis in fact.
If Wootton were moved to a holding school for a year while the current building was leveled and a new building in its place, would you have an issue?  No.  So that is not a thing.
There may be an additional student cohort, not splitting up the current one.

So yes, there will be changes- many students very much inconvenienced by traveling to a new location.  That is real.  Yes, there will be a new name, but I can't see the meaningful argument for why that matters much.  And...tell me why additional students is a bad thing?[/quote]
Of course there will be teacher and admin turnover.   That's what happens when a school closes and another opens.  As for students, they're proposing to add a couple extra ES and they'll probably remove an ES or two which changes the cohort.  Change is bad when things are working well and Wooton is one of the state's best high schools.  Just admit that you hate the W schools and want to see them eliminated.[/quote]

That's not why there would be turnover.  There is turnover yearly at every school.  Usually, teachers want closer to home, better admin, teaching their actual classes they were train for, etc.

Your kids will be ok if they add another ES.  Its a good learning lesson for them to be in the real world with actual low income and not just rich pretending they are low income.[/quote]
I'm glad we agree that when a school closes and a new one opens there are reasons new teachers might to want to teach there or existing teachers might find it too far and this will cause more turnover than usual.  And you outed yourself as an anti-W school, pro-busser with "Its a good learning lesson for them to be in the real world with actual low income." [/quote]

Yeah I'm not a fan of them and is a reason why we purposely avoided some of the richer areas... Yes we're one of the ones that could've afforded to live somewhere more expensive but didn't want our kids in that environment.

But some people honestly can live in a segregated world and that's their world.  And it's fine.  It's just different worlds and classes.

But some of these "anti-W school" people think that their point of view or world is the right way and how everyone should do and see things.

It goes back to the debate about county wide magnet programs.  Some of these students are coming out and benefiting society and leading change.  Whereas a lot of posters on here are saying that enrichment isn't needed for these types of students and the focus should be for the greater population who are struggling.

It's the same point of view when it comes to wanting to tear down W schools or forcing mixed demographics or integration.  If they do that, can they guarantee the same level of academic rigor and standards that some of these families were looking for in choosing an area to live in and send their kids to?[/quote]

The W schools have advanced classes for these students.  Its the kids in the other schools that are lacking in course offerings that need the magnets to achieve to the same level.[/quote]

This is kind of the mentality out there, where people want things for free.

Maybe five or ten years ago on this forum people would post, "It's all one school district.  It's all the same curriculum"  And that was a very naive way of thinking.  And people that knew, knew which schools to look for and why some areas were more desirable and expensive than others.  In the Wootton school district there are rentals available, both homes and townhomes.  And they have the apartments over by the Traville Shopping Center.  And there were some homes with multiple families living there. The specific cases I'm thinking of are African immigrants.  So yeah believe it or not there are URM minorities in the Wootton school district.

So people were willing to sacrifice to give their kids a chance for a better education.

Fast forward to now, people are realizing there really is an inequality between schools.  Such as in the different levels of rigor in the same class in different schools, leading to limited advanced offerings at some schools because supposedly there weren't enough students interested and qualified for it.

And instead of looking at the root of the problem and trying to improve it to make more students qualified for the classes, they're saying it's not fair so we should make it equal for everyone.  So those people who decided to take the "grasshopper" route by buying a really nice house on a nice plot of land say that no one should take the really advanced classes or be in the advanced programs because not everyone qualifies for it.  Or trying to mix the W students in with some other populations so there would be enough students for the advanced classes.  But some of these students come from different elementary schools with the same different levels of preparation.  So what happens if some of them can't perform or keep up with the material?  Well MCPS doesn't fail anyone, so they'll slow down the curriculum for everyone in the class and school.

If people say they purposely avoid Wootton because they didn't want their kids in a pressure cooker environment, well don't complain that Wootton and other W schools have more advanced classes than other schools.  Because that pressure cooker environment is what pushed kids to be able to take those courses and eligible for the countywide programs.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics