Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Puck suggests that Blake's lawyers might name Freedman himself in their amended lawsuit. 1) Do you guys think that's plausible, and if so why? 2) Will they be able to do so?

"If there’s a headline from the hearing, it’s that Blake Lively plans to add new claims and new defendants. Michael Gottlieb, her lead attorney, didn’t specify who else might be
dragged into the war, although he hinted that the move may scramble Baldoni’s legal representation, which raised my suspicion that Freedman himself could be named."

https://puck.news/newsletter_content/what-im-hearing-emilia-fallout-blake-baldoni-in-court-grammy-chatter-3/[/quote]

If that’s what they’re planning, it’s not going to give her any points with the public. Remove Baldoni from his own movie. Remove Freedman from his own case.

[/quote]

I think the number of people who know the name of Baldoni's lawyer or would care of he was removed from the case is vanishingly small. Most people are not as obsessed with this case as the people on this thread.[/quote]

Well that’s not true. [/quote]

No one outside a fairly narrow group had heard of him before this case. If I asked any member of my extended family who necessary by showing his name and photo, they would have no idea. Kids, adults, my mom, my cousins. They read stuff like US Weekly but they aren't tracking lawyer commentary on this case. They know who the famous actors are, but not the lawyers.[/quote]

You said most people are not as obsessed with this case as the people on this board. That’s what I was disagreeing with. I don’t know that people know the attorney’s name, but I think plenty are obsessed (for a variety of reasons). [/quote]

I know some people are obsessed (hi, it's me) but I think it's actually a tiny portion of the public. I think most people have a vague idea of what's going on but not enough to know or care which side wins these sorts of pretrial motions.[/quote]

I don’t think the lawyer will be named the defendant. But I kinda meant like, if he were, yes the obsessed public would freak out because the media would have a field day with that as a headline.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics