Reply to The Blind Side scandal

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "The Blind Side scandal"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How do you know there was no money? Seems like providing the accounting of the conservatorship could have been done in an afternoon if there is nothing to report.[/quote]

Because there was no source for the money. Do you know how any of this works? Where or who would the money come from?[/quote]

The judge is going to demand to know why they haven't filed any reports of the conservatorship for the last 18 years. If there's no activity to report, they can attest to the judge under the penalty of perjury.

Pretty simple to do. Unless, of course, they are trying to hide something from Oher.

But as they say in the movies: "Tell it to the judge."[/quote]

Ok. Seems like this is going to be pretty straightforward. Oher has all his NFL money, book money and all the other money he's made. Seems he wants to look back at the Blindside money. But unlike the vast majority of conservatorship cases, Oher has been in charge of all his own finances for a very long time. There's no there, there as they say. There's no secret revenue generating stream of Michael's money that they have any control over and he doesn't. You can't even offer one example of what this could all be about. Other than "we can't possibly know!" Which is totally bizarre.[/quote]

Well, holding yourselves out as having adopted someone that you did not is bizarre; allowing the conservatorship to be created and continue is bizarre; making money off of/feeding your narcissism via exploiting the life story of at risk youth is bizarre/morally repugnant. There needs to be an accounting of the conservatorship and likely the tax records of the family to the extent that they claimed him as a dependent, etc. [/quote]

You’re describing a fishing expedition. This is not what the court is going to order.

Someone in this thread is 1) close to Oher 2) as delusional as Oher.

You have to have an actual legal theory of harm plus evidence of it for this case to go anywhere. Missing filings for a defunct conservatorship ain’t it. [/quote]
DP. Huh? Asking for required reporting to be done is not a fishing expedition. And even if there was no money involved, which seems to be your whole premise, they still may have been required to fulfill their reporting obligations (in much the same way non-filers may, depending on the circumstance, still be required to file a tax return). [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics