Reply to Lock him up indictment FL

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Lock him up indictment FL"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://twitter.com/willscharf/status/1669333151569543168[/twitter][/quote]

Good for him, he can be another in a long line of clowns to serve as Missouri's Attorney General.

No, clown, the PRA does NOT allow the President to decide that records having to do with national defense and security are "personal records."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=44-USC-2035507102-1726767310&term_occur=999&term_src=title:44:chapter:22:section:2203

[b]The term “personal records” means all documentary materials, or any reasonably segregable portion therof, of a purely private or nonpublic character which do not relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President.[/b][/quote]

Every time these idiots cite the Presidential Records Act, it is a tell, because the indictment never cites the PRA but rather the Espionage Act. This is one of those "no collusion" half truths the GOP is so good at using.[/quote]

But they are wrong even about the wrong law. The point of the PRA is that official documents do NOT belong to the President. The law was passed because Nixon was going to destroy all the official records and the government had to pay him to get them back. Under PRA, NARA controls the status of official Presidential documents. [/quote]
+1
[twitter]https://twitter.com/joenbc/status/1669519868045979648?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics