Reply to new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]PP, you would be a terrible juror.  You believe testimony is sufficient to convict in the absence of any corroborating evidence even though the testimony itself is riddled with gaps with regard to large details and inconsistencies with regard to small details.

When the testimony is that poor, you need some kind of corroborating evidence. CF had none--her best friend said she recalled no such party even though there is a lot of evidence she was pressured to say otherwise.  There was not one person who stepped forward to say she told them about it at the time.  In addition to which, it is not difficult to infer CF had political motives for reporting this to Feinstein. This is a weak, weak case.

I certainly hope to never have you on my jury.  And having been on several I can say pretty certainly you'd be that one that all the other jurors complain about.[/quote]

This, exactly.  There is no way PP could *ever* be an impartial juror.  She’d rely only on how she “feels” about the accused and not on facts or evidence.  Or even, apparently, common sense.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics