Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Women’s groups now taking position against male feminist Justin Baldoni’s weaponization of defamation claims, but sure, he is just a poor widdle victim here. [/quote] This is not going to appeal to this particular judge. Very bad strategic choice.[/quote] Wow, I think you are so wrong. I’m not saying he welcomes more briefs to read with open arms but one of these briefs takes a close look at application of California state law, which if he chooses to apply CA law I think he will look at. Briefs like this that dissect the law in matter of fact language without making wild, dumb accusations against the parties are generally going to be accepted by judges, including Liman. [/quote] Agreed. I clerked for a federal judge and a well written amicus brief on an issue like this was generally welcomed because it facilitated our internal analysis of the law. There may be amicus briefs arguing the other side of this specific issue as well (application of the CA law that protects SH accusers from defamation claims), and that could greatly reduce the work for Liman and his staff. Of course they will do their own research of the relevant law and precedents, but well composed amicus briefs are generally welcome. They focus on the law and not the parties. It's helpful.[/quote] [b]Look, it’s the totally organic lively bots[/b]. This is not a complicated issue of law that needs an amicus at a motion to dismiss stage. When no one who actually knows you is supporting your cause, time to for the desperation route.[/quote] Dp. But we can’t call them that! They’re real and we are just being paranoid and silly! I tend to think the amicus may be legit, but that this particular lawyer/survivor is mistaken and wants to #believewomen and see the law upheld (admittedly I haven’t dug into this issue). As much as she might be a legit survivor, Blake is not [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics