Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Women’s groups now taking position against male feminist Justin Baldoni’s weaponization of defamation claims, but sure, he is just a poor widdle victim here. [/quote] When you don’t have facts on your side, you pull stunts like this. Liman won’t like it, more clutter on his docket to go with those wildly inappropriate Rule 11 motions.[/quote] lol, no. Wait, did they file triple hearsay declarations claiming an opposing attorney committed extortion? No??? If not I bet he will accept these amicus briefs. [/quote] How is it triple hearsay? And it wasn’t being used as evidence at trial. So it’s not relevant if it’s hearsay . But of course you know that [/quote] Freedman wasn’t attesting to actions Lively or her attorney took that he has first hand knowledge of. He was told by someone else. So Freedman is testifying about something he heard from a third party. [b]The person who told him also apparently did not appear to have firsthand knowledge of the info in the affidavit. That person was not included in any text from Lively to Swift, and does not appear to have attended the call between Gottlieb and Baldridge.[/b] So the third party that Freedman received info from that he put in his affidavit themselves did not hear the information directly, but got it from yet another party who heard/made the statement. Triple hearsay is exactly this: when a witness provides info about something they heard from a third party, who in turn heard it from a second party, who originally made/heard the statement. [/quote] Well, I don’t think we necessarily know that. But in any event, this wasn’t being introduced as evidence at trial. So why does it matter? And I’m sure you realize that if it were a lie, it would have come out as incorrect by one of the many swift parties who have direct lines to various Media [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics