Reply to APS Boundary tool--anyone get it to work yet?

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "APS Boundary tool--anyone get it to work yet? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Has anyone seen the new option that kanninen asked for at the last work session? I thought Murphy told the sb it could be posted by tonight in advance of the meeting tomorrow?[/quote]

What was Kanninen asking for?[/quote]

She stupidly said it might not make sense to move any students if in the last year the size at all 3 schools were over 100%.  Never mind that for the prior years the 3 schools would be under.  Anyway she asked for option a Wakefield minus 3706 and Yorktown b. I wanted to see how overcapacity it would be with this option.[/quote]

I heard that, but was confused.  Isn't Wakefield Option A without 3706 the same as Wakefield Option B?

The work session made my head spin. They asked APS for some 60/40 split options, then circled back to 50/50 options.  The poor APS staff is probably going crazy!  [/quote]

She didn't seem to make much sense. First she said she preferred only wl have trailers rather than all 3 schools. OK, so 5 trailers for all 4 years at WL rather than maybe trailers for the last year only. They did say they might be able to move up the bouindary change one year to address this. But than anfter saying this K asks whether these options leave enough room for IB transfers. So not only does she want no overcrosding at yorktown but then WL is somehow supposed to have enough space for IB transfers. What kind of logic is that?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics