Reply to ECNL moving to school year part 2

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s undeniable that the boost for Aug-Dec kids will be huge.

RAE is obvious.

My son’s club Academy1 team has 95% players Q1/Q2, and only one Q3 (my son).

However Academy2 is packed with Q3/Q4s.

It will change next year once SY is implemented.[/quote]

You don't understand RAE.[/quote]They do, you don't.[/quote]
No, you're just looking for the excuse du jour. Today its rae tomorrow it will be whatever coach doesn’t develop your kid enough so they can be pro players. Soon all the money in the world wont buy your way onto whatever team you think your kid should be on.

Once this happens you'll walk away from the wreckage and havoc you've created for everyone else. Happy that you "made a differnce".[/quote]Older kids tend to be better at sports than younger kids. Not sure why this accepted fact makes you bitter and angry and lash put. Saul good man.[/quote]
Older kids? Your comment makes no sense.

But seriously what is the next excuse you plan to latch onto?[/quote]

The reason they switched from SY to BY in the first place had to do with the majority of youth national team players being born Aug to November and they’d play internationally and the other countries were mostly Jan to June so we were at a disadvantage because are players were younger and smaller.

So we went with BY to align with the majority of other countries with the hopes that if US youth national teams could compete that would mean are men’s team would eventually compete as well.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics