Reply to Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]DP. I find it completely believable that she hit him, and also the cops later broke it and distributed it to ensure a conviction, and in so doing, actually created reasonable doubt which may get her off. That's certainly more plausible than the cops killing him and dumping him in their own front lawn.[/quote]

I can see why you might go this third way, but please go back and look at the actual evidence admitted into the record at this trial.

There was not enough time to plant tail light evidence, even IF you believe that the police broke her tail light in the sally port and don't trust your own eyes to see the tail light is already missing at the 5am Ring camera recorded departure from John's driveway and the 8am welfare check dashcam of the responding Canton PD. It is exactly as much missing as it is later in the sally port, minus all the packed in snow that was in the dashcam video.

The time that the vehicle arrived at the sally port and the time that the SERT team began searching 34 Fairview doesn't allow for the planting of tail light especially not as it was mostly recovered over the following weeks as the more than foot of snow finally melted away from the scene.

The accident reconstructionist and biomedical engineer with 30 years' experience showed that the tail light can be broken by hitting a person as low as 8mph according to his calculations. The defendant's much less experienced reconstructionist proved the tail light could be shattered at 17 and 24mph, both of which are consistent with CW's theory of case. Welcher testified that we can never know the exact physics of the collision so we can never get the maths exact - but the CW's theory of the case falls within the reasonable parameters calculated from what we CAN and DO know.

There is PLENTY of room for a reasonable jury to get back reasonable doubt with the body of evidence admitted thus far - and the CW still has a rebuttal case to put on.

I hope Karen is enjoying this cloudy/rainy weekend in the greater Boston area. Likely to be one of her last in a long time.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics