Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Haven’t had a chance to review the motions yet , but the video of Blake siting on the floor, explaining to no one in particular what exactly makes her hideous sequined boots so “sexy” is pure gold. [/quote] Where can I see the video? I thought it was all pdfs. I have barely begun reading what WF posted, it will be fun reading through the weekend (but so many redactions...). I could have sworn Lively's attorneys had said they definitely intended to file MSJ. Everyone thought it was odd, because she's the plaintiff, but I thought they actually said that to Liman in a hearing. Now I wonder if that was why unsealed that exhibit yesterday (posted earlier on this page, their outline of what TAG did), so they at least had something for PR to counter all the exhibits WF is putting out. [/quote] There is one filing of video clips. Not sure of the docket number.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
