Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]WF filed a motion for summary judgment on the claims of sexual harassment. It’s a huge filing so I am linking to a Reddit post which summarizes the filings, albeit in a manner very favorable to WF. https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/s/8xrF8jWhzn[/quote] I haven't read this yet but I think it's going to be next to impossible to get SJ on the sexual harassment claims because if there are any disputed facts on the alleged harassment incidents (and there are many) it can't be ruled on as a matter of law. So this document is being filed primarily for PR purposes. Nothing wrong with that -- it's a good idea and a good chance to get their arguments in front of the judge and the public. But just stating this now because there is virtually no chance the judge will grant this motion because of how SJ works. I know lots of people will scream "Liman's in the tank for Lively" but it's just not the way the law works.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
