Reply to ECNL moving to school year part 2

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Damn, we've replaced SY-60 guy with my RL Aug-Dec kid will be the next Messi OR Rodman, so NL current team kids get out of the way! I'm not sure what's more annoying.[/quote]Your hyperbole doesn't fly. Posters saying players moving down an age group from starting in RL get NL bench/back of roster and NL bench/back of roster that stays in age group gets bumped to RL starters. Basically, ranking the kids moves them up or down 5-6 slots in an age group on a team but many will leave and new ones will come in based on the new individual player rankings. And that creates a big shuffle, nobody saying US will ever produce a Messi.[/quote]

Sorry to say, there'll be movement but not so much from RL. You're buying into the hype.[/quote]I get why you look at your kids age RL team and think why there will be little movement but look one year up and the truth will set you free. Then realize that there are about 2-3 RL teams for every NL team and then you realize the shake up will be bigger than you think. But coach lock will provide some sand in the gears for some teams destined to get overrun by the bigger teams for a year as many clubs that will be too slow to adjust.[/quote]

Size isn't really an issue at older ages. Where you may see the movement you think will happen are at the weaker ECNL clubs. There are plenty of those, but there's always a lot of turnover at them.[/quote]You must be referring to girls side.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics