Reply to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Friday called for a response from a Virginia school

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Friday called for a response from a Virginia school"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There was no incentive in the previous process to disclose FARMS status.  In fact, as has been pointed out, given the stigma associated with FARMS in some communities- it is very likely that FARMS was underreported in the past.

What I am saying that there is enough of “reasonable doubt” as to whether the new process resulted in more socio-economic diversity.  If you want to make that claim then you have to make sure all your t’s are crossed and i’s  dotted.  That is simply not the case at this time. [/quote]

“Reasonable doubt” is a standard used to acquit defendants in a criminal trial, you buffoon.[/quote]

I am not a lawyer and you are are not an expert of education policy, you pompous joker.  So unless I am on a legal forum arguing against you, you can sit back, relax and work on your verbal skills.  I am sure calling people names has not won you any acquittals [/quote]

Are you claiming to be an expert of education policy? Because you did use a legal term to describe a situation inappropriately and incorrectly in order to advance your narrative and try to shift the burden of proof. I'm pointing out that you're doing it not only wrong, but clumsily and oafishly.[/quote]

Echo chamber participant #1.  Keep it coming.  Sounds of lambs bleating.

All of us are on an anonymous board and unless we identify ourselves we cannot claim expertise on any subject let alone education policy.  I am merely pointing out that you cannot expect me to follow court etiquette in usage of terms in this forum.  Reasonable doubt is an English phrase which perhaps has a technical meaning in court procedure. This is not a court and I believe the phrase conveys my intent in the context of this discussion.  [/quote]

It certainly conveys your intent - no doubt about that. We can agree there.

You have no evidence to back up your assertion, and so the only strategy you are left with is to try to reassign the burden of proof using flowery language that you might have heard from somewhere but are misappropriating for effect.

And I'm calling you out on your bulls**t. [/quote]

I love it when these trolls get roasted by people who actually know what they're talking about. it's incredibly satisfying.[/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics