Reply to Barr and Durham

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Barr and Durham"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://twitter.com/BrookeSingman/status/1500219673354379264[/twitter][/quote]

There are emails to back Durham’s statements up[/quote]

Durham’s statement is stupid. The FBI knew he worked for the DNC. [/quote]

The text message he revealed in Monday's filing said this to General Counsel for the FBI James Baker:

"Jim—it’s Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss. Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? I’m coming on my own—not on behalf of a client or company—[b]want to help the Bureau. Thanks."

This text was sent the day before he told Baker about "purported data and 'white papers' that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel" between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.

[b]So, he claimed to be representing himself.  A lie.  [/b]

[/quote]

The bolded is the crux of the issue. 
[/quote]

Is a personal text message subject to those laws? Doubtful.[/quote]

So we are no longer denying that Sussman lied, just debating if he can be held accountable?[/quote]

What is the evidence that he was in fact there on behalf of a client?  What client specifically?[/quote]

He worked for Hillary Clinton. That's been established. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics