Reply to new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]The answer to this is of course.  [/b]

But Ford had zero supporting evidence for a 30+ year old claim and as for rape Swetnick was quickly discredited. I am not sure what perjury you are referring to except that he denied these allegations, which does not constitute perjury

And as has been explained to you time and time again his finances were covered in a closed hearing--if those at the hearing thought there was any there there, they would have raised it in the open hearings.  But they didn't and it is very likely his parents paid off his debts.[/quote]
And this is why the White House spiked the FBI’s investigation. The FBI [i]does[/i] investigate cold cases and they frequently [i]can[/i] come to conclusions. Why didn’t they allow an investigation? McConnell had held a Court seat open for how long? There was no rush. These two facts - that the FBI can conduct investigations of decades old crimes and be able to come to accurate conclusions and there was no rush for the seat - suggest to me that not only was Christine Blasey Ford’s account correct, but that an investigation might have revealed additional similar crimes. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics