Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The fact that the cop’s Ring camera was erased and he got rid of his dog and phone is all I need to have reasonable doubt. And that just scratches the surface of the sketchy story. The mirrored video was jaw dropping. [/quote] Yeah. The ring being erased. Incredible. And then the mirrored video from where the car was impounded. I just can’t even with these cops. Clearly trying to frame her. But why?? Bc they did it? Or bc they just hated her and thought it was her fault in some way, even if not intentional? [/quote] Rumor is Proctor saw her text to Yaneti that she hit him which can't be entered as evidence. They probably went over the top trying to nail her which ironically will get her off.[/quote] Even if there were such a text, it is not necessarily reliable or believable. A grieving person in a state of shock can say all kinds of things that are not true. In addition, how do we know when someone has a real memory versus a false memory? Can we believe anything anyone says? [/quote] Are you delusional? When someone says they killed someone, we tend to believe them. [/quote] It is not at all uncommon for someone who has suddenly lost a loved one to have feelings of guilt and thoughts that they may be at fault somehow. Grief shows up in many different ways and people can experience it in ways that others may think are odd or extreme. The “false memory” is an allusion to Kelly Dever who testified to the FBI about an entire scene she said she saw and then went back and said, “Whoops, that was a “false memory.” I never could have seen what I said I saw.” Apparently people can just say things, even under oath, but can later say the opposite, no harm, no foul, because it’s a “false memory.” [/quote] Okay fool The sky is falling. [/quote] Is the “fool” here the person who has empathy for a person in shock and grieving for a loved one who has died suddenly? Or is it the young person who trained to make detailed observations who suddenly realizes that a “memory” they had relayed to the FBI was completely made up out of whole cloth and false? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics