Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "The Mueller Report"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In over 400 pages of his report, at no point does Mueller assert that he could find probable cause to charge President Trump (or any of Trump's family members) with any crime. That is the legal standard in America that governs all criminal prosecutions. The prosecution must show that probable cause exists to believe the defendant committed the crime. Probable cause is a very low level of evidence, it is just the minimum to bring criminal charges. Even if there is probable cause, the defendant is still presumed innocent until proved guilty by a jury of 12, beyond a reasonable doubt. The Mueller report doesn't come close to making a finding of probable cause as to a single alleged "crime" by President Trump. There is no such standard of "we were unable to prove the President did NOT commit a crime" in American jurisprudence. It is not a relevant statement by the Mueller team. Similar is "we did not exonerate him". That is an imaginary legal standard which simply does not exist. [/quote] Where did you go to law school?[/quote] Wikipedia. I wish Robert Mueller had gone there too: Probable cause In United States criminal law, probable cause is the standard by which police authorities have reason to obtain a warrant for the arrest of a suspected criminal or the issuing of a search warrant. It is also the standard by which grand juries issue criminal indictments. The principle behind the standard is to limit the power of authorities to perform random or abusive searches (unlawful search and seizure), and to promote lawful evidence gathering and procedural form during criminal arrest and prosecution. The standard also applies to personal or property searches.[1] The term comes from the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [/quote] The written Mueller Report as well as the presser he gave specifically addresses what you (falsely) claim. If you actually read it, you will see how banal your post is. And citing Wikipedia for a case that involved an investigation of the President of the United States is plain stupidity. Read the report.[/quote] Exoneration. Read it.[/quote] You are not American. You are a traitor along with the Russian puppet. The word exonerated isn’t found at all. You have never read the report. Liar cult 45 member of the liar-in-chief. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics