Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Let’s just go right to Freedman’s letter.  He specifically states his filing is responsive and wants to address the contention that the DC subpoena is not seeking relevant info.  I’m not going to argue about the plain language of his filing:

We write in response to the letter filed by Plaintiff/Consolidated Defendant Blake Lively (“Ms.
Lively”) and Consolidated Defendant Ryan Reynolds (together, the “Lively Defendants”)
regarding their requested intervention in an action in the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia seeking to quash the Wayfarer Parties’ subpoena (the “Subpoena”) to
Venable LLP (“Venable”) (Dkt. 213). 
. . . . 
However, the Lively Defendants’
insistence that the Subpoena seeks irrelevant information is wrong. The Subpoena aims to obtain
discovery relating to witness tampering and evidence spoliation.[/quote]

No. Just answer my question about your familiarity with letters like Governski’s. It will let me know whether you know what you’re talking about. [/quote]

DP. Look, you lost the argument and this issue and it really does not matter either way whether you think Freedman’s letter was appropriate or not. It’s done. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics