Reply to Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The fact that the cop’s Ring camera was erased and he got rid of his dog and phone is all I need to have reasonable doubt. And that just scratches the surface of the sketchy story. The mirrored video was jaw dropping. [/quote]

Yeah. The ring being erased. Incredible. And then the mirrored video from where the car was impounded. I just can’t even with these cops. Clearly trying to frame her. But why?? Bc they did it? Or bc they just hated her and thought it was her fault in some way, even if not intentional? [/quote]

Rumor is Proctor saw her text to Yaneti that she hit him which can't be entered as evidence. They probably went over the top trying to nail her which ironically will get her off.[/quote]

But why erase the Ring camera and get rid of the dog then? It's not just that they fabricated evidence to nail her... That I could believe was over zealous police work to nail the person who they "knew" was guilty. It's that they eliminated other evidence. Deleting the Ring video almost certainly means that the narrative of she hit him, he fell down and died and no one saw him until morning is false. It could be that she did it... but they found him earlier and left his body there. It could be that a dog was somehow involved in knocking him down or attacking him once he was down. I don't know. But I don't know how the deletion of the Ring video and getting rid of a family pet couldn't leave you with reasonable doubt about the official narrative.[/quote]

The only Ring camera video that was erased was from John's house, and the only person who could have done it was Karen, because John was dying on the front lawn of 34 Fairview where she left him after she hit him. That house did not have Ring camera. The house across the street had a different brand of door camera, battery operated, which was positioned so it only captured the front doorstep and a very small part of the lawn in front of *that* house - not the road and not the lawn of the house across the street. The idea that camera footage which might have captured the collision between Karen's vehicle and John's body was erased is pure FKR nonsense - and of course, the magically think it was footage of John being dragged onto the lawn by his dear friends who had just murdered him. STUPID.

The dog was rehomed months after John's death, shortly after the dog got into a fight with another dog and bit the neighbor who tried to break the dog fight up. The dog's rehoming has ZERO to do with John's death. John's injuries did not come from a dog, there was no dog DNA on his clothing nor any dog hair. Another magical thinking FKR cult fabrication.

Karen Read got wasted and in her rage she backed into her boyfriend who had been trying to break up with her for weeks. This was a domestic violence murder. The sickest thing about the majority of posts in this thread is that you'd be raging if Kurt Read had mowed down Julie O'Keefe and left her to die in the cold and the snow.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics