Reply to Walz vs. Vance: VP Debate Oct 1 2024

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Walz vs. Vance: VP Debate Oct 1 2024"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://x.com/likebutterfield/status/1841324979821965626[/twitter]

This is not good for the GOP[/quote]

I googled abortion during the debate, and it was because Vance started telling lies about Minnesota abortion laws and I wanted to see what he was talking about.
[quote]
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/10/01/us/factcheck-walz-vance
“The statute you signed into law, it says that a doctor who presides over an abortion where the baby survives — the doctor is under no obligation to provide life-saving care to a baby who survives a botched late-term abortion.”
— Senator JD Vance

This is false.
Mr. Vance is distorting Mr. Walz’s repeal of a so-called born alive law that had been in effect in Minnesota since the 1970s. That law required doctors to report when a “live child” was “born as the result of an abortion,” and to provide “all reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice” to care for that infant.[/quote][/quote]

How is the false? 
Vance accurately described the law that Walz signed. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics